And follows the ferocious monster by subjecting to the noble and good people of Venezuela and who called Mr Chavez fierce Monster cold, is not someone who is characterized by its proximity to the right hand or fascism precisely, I am someone who defends human rights at any cost, pursues the oppression in any of its forms, which condemns the dictatorship, absolutism and autocracy. Yes, already is that you are where it is thanks to the popular vote, but even if what I say is very hard, I can not silence him, you buy the votes of illiteracy and of the more radical ignorance by coca-cola and populist promises that barely meets. Not it promises to eradicate begging in the streets? Why not promises to cultivate and educate its people and instead of letting thousands of young deambulen through the streets cares and tries to fill College classrooms? Why not it establishes a social and effective health care system? Not it seeks to eliminate prostitution as a livelihood for many families? Why not create dignified housing and eliminates those miserable huts in which they live their voters, no light, no water, no sewer? Why not? There are so many do whys? that would not fit a book you loosely knows the needs of its people, but better sink in absolute misery and at worst the ostracism to Excel so over you, your warlordism and its energumeno-imperialismo. info. I am not someone who is can accuse Yankee Pro, I am a person of class, social, worker, lover of Venezuela, represaliado by their hosts, abused by their energumenos-policias, my crime be Spanish. You has sunk the economy of your country to unsuspected limits, but people from other countries have to thank him for something, have nationalised sectors in the hands of foreign multinationals, this allows that go from your country and do not suffer more pressured and threatened by his crooked and corrupt government. . .
It would that a forensic documenting injuries of women victims of gender-based violence knew how to treat them properly and what are their rights not essential to his work? Not find the essential reader that a journalist could know in detail the freedom of press, freedom of expression and the right of citizens to information? Should not the Professor of education for citizenship and human rights have studied human rights? A recent report by Amnesty International has focused its attention on the Spanish University. Its forceful title, Spanish universities, at the tail of Europe in compulsory human rights training, reveals the position occupied by the training in human rights in higher education of our country. But we still have time to change. The University should take advantage of the current process of reform of qualifications to correct this unjustifiable lack. It might be thought that this endeavour of Amnesty International just as justification the activism that is you own, but the truth is that rights training is part of the University’s mission. As reflected repeatedly the World Declaration on higher education, indicating values education as one of their duties members of the University Community citizens.
Training in human rights is not an exclusive matter of the degrees of law, but it is an essential training to find the future professional activity of students oriented under a social responsibility that must be provided by a human rights approach. A more recent legislative reference establishes that an increase of public awareness and the teaching of international humanitarian law and human rights law should be promoted. Can you imagine a more propitious place to carry out this task that the University? Often, educational authorities, who share, and even encourage, these references, conceive the teaching of human rights as a unique field of the degrees of law. More than a catalog of items, human rights are the framework of legal reference and most important local, national and universal ethics in the contemporary world.