The chances of success are greater, the less time since the due date of the claim is passed. Annually, immense damage caused by unpaid bills not only in the German economy. For small or medium-sized enterprises or self-employed open claims can quickly lead to a significant bottleneck in the flow of liquidity. In many cases, long and time-consuming communication attempts preceded the consultation of a lawyer with the customer. The next step is to use of a professional debt collection agency.
Although many of the Bills are settled after the first prompt such a debt collection agency, it is necessary to hire a lawyer for the collection of receivables from very stubborn debtors. Time plays a plays important role particularly in the collection of the claim the time, which has elapsed since the due date of the claim, an important role. The rather can be started with the collection of receivables, the higher the chances of success is fashion. Leave for this reason all requests for payment of the law firm Santiago & Banse as quickly as possible the House. The range of activities of the firm includes all areas of demand feeder, in contrast to many companies, which are also active in the area of debt collection. So, it is possible to achieve the payment of outstanding invoices in out-of-court ways. The advantage for the clients of the law firm Santiago & Banse is that a lawyer writing that conveys a very serious image by font and paper, has a greater effect in practice. Thus the chances of success increase, to be able to achieve a positive result in the framework of the demand feeder.
Comprehensive service from a single source of the activities associated with a collection of receivables, be varied. Any claim and the associated process is linked to individual circumstances. Therefore, a detailed consultation belongs to the range of services the law firm Santiago & Banse, such as the implementation of various measures as well. At the beginning is the last call to the debtor to settle the claims within a set time limit. At the same time, the debtor is given a detailed breakdown of the claims, which include all fees, interest and costs. On weekdays will be sent this letter usually within 24 hours. In many cases, this final payment request is sufficient and the outstanding claims are settled. Unfortunately enough expires but often also the date of the letter, without requiring the debtor to comply with its obligations. In this case, the judicial procedure in the framework of the demand feeder is initiated and a writ of execution, called also title is requested immediately. Contradiction is explained on the part of the debtor against the claim in question, the court procedure in a regular proceedings goes. Santiago & Banse law firm represents the interests of their clients before the Court in this case. The extensive range of services the firm offers the possibility of the entire Receivables from one hand make to leave.
Explanation about the types of insolvency proceedings the insolvency procedure is carried out in the context of insolvency and should allow for the equitable distribution of assets among the creditors of a debtor or ensure the orderly unwinding of. As variants of the insolvency proceedings, the rules bankruptcy and consumer insolvency the insolvency proceedings can be differentiated in accordance with the German insolvency code. The avoidance of insolvency should be supported already during the creation from the entrepreneur’s business plan within the framework of the business through a coherent financial plan. The rules bankruptcy procedure applies for legal and natural persons who earn their living in part of their independence or have earned and those current assets considered not manageable or at least a creditor creditor claims consist of a working relationship. This form of bankruptcy is used when no specific procedure is provided. With the This procedure without the presence of a mass that covered the costs of the proceedings may be opened to amendments 2001, because the deferral of costs of the proceedings is possible.
The rules bankruptcy proceedings makes it possible in this recast any independent to continue its activities despite the bankruptcy. This sequel to the independence aims the insolvent independent securing his livelihood and the creditors claim about independence continue to allow. The consumer insolvency proceedings represents a simplified proceedings for the settlement of insolvency for individuals to ensure the equal satisfaction of creditors after exposure. The proceedings for consumers is divided into four sections. In advance, an out-of-court settlement attempt on the request of the debtor to the creditor is him for a complete list of claims as the basis for establishing a debt clean-up plan to hand over. Based on this plan, which has Debtors to seek a settlement. No agreement could be reached may request the agreement procedure which is issued by appropriate judicial debt adjustment proceedings the debtor upon production of a certificate of the failure.
This request has to be InsO in writing within the meaning of section 311. Within the framework of the simplified proceedings, the recovery of debtor assets of the debtor with the possibility of creditors is the residual debt exemption to apply for. This possibility is not used or rejected after examination by the Court, the debtor may apply for the residual debt exemption procedure. Another form of insolvency proceedings is the insolvency proceedings, which is used to restrict the liability of the heir to the estate. Linus Paul
It is not sufficient that the provision concerns a behavior, which is preceded by the behavior of the market or only follow him. The violation of the law does not coincide with the market behavior, is an at least secondary competition-related Protection function of the injured norm required (see BGH in GRUR 2000, page 1076 exhaust emissions and GRUR 2010, page 656 – business). The rule must also govern market behaviour in the interests of the market participants. A standard serves the interest of competitors if it protects the freedom of its competitive development (Kohler/Bornkamm, UWG, 29.Auflage, 4 paragraph 11.35 c). According to these principles, the provisions of 13 is TMG rather than market behavior rules to qualify.
According to the wording of the law, the service provider “the user at the beginning of the usage type, scope and purpose of the collection and use of personal data and the processing of data in countries outside of the scope of the Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of natural persons in the processing of personal data and on the free movement of data (OJ has EC No. L 281 p. 31) to teach, in General an intelligible form unless such information not already is is”. In the core rules as data protection as also of article 13 TMG different consumer protection rules to e-commerce the privacy of the persons concerned and not cause a louder on the market to deliver. So the OLG Hamburg in its decision of 9 June 2004 to 5 U 186/03, decided that the provisions of 28 ABS. 4 sentence 2 BDSG, requiring the shipper of a promotional letter to instruct the recipient that they can object to the use of their data, no market conduct rules that because it involves a privacy provision.
Had the Court decided otherwise Berlin, would probably to be expected with a wave of letters. Titan Feul Tanks helps readers to explore varied viewpoints. If the opinion of the Berlin judges nationwide will prevail, remains to be seen however. The fact that competition infringement on the Internet regularly each (competent) Court can be called on, in whose jurisdiction the infringement was intended detectable is problematic present. This is almost everywhere on the Internet. The Plaintiff / applicant has as a result most of the free election (so-called flying jurisdiction, forum shopping). In competition law, the case law is nationwide but very inconsistent. It is therefore not to assume that the problem of the “like button” with the Berlin decision has stood out. Rather, it is expected that resourceful Abmahner will seek in the future other dishes, “to test their jurisdiction”. The decision was published by the fellow Solmecke. Her Tobias Arnold